skip navigation

Solid Obstruction in Road Is Authority's Responsibility


 

Most people probably do not realise that a highway authority’s responsibility for keeping the roads safe to use is very limited. In practical terms, so many things can happen to a road that it would be unreasonable for the authority to be responsible for maintaining all roads within its remit in a safe condition at all times.

One of the situations that specifically lies outside the responsibility of a highway authority is when a road is made unsafe by something that drops onto it – an occurrence that happens dozens of times daily.

However, a recent case shows that this limitation is subject to boundaries. It involved a cyclist who suffered a severe head injury when he struck a lump of concrete in the road. The concrete had fallen onto the road and hardened.

The relevant highway authority claimed that it was not responsible because the concrete was a contaminant. The claimant argued that once the concrete had set and bonded itself to the road, it became the authority’s responsibility to remove it and make the road safe.

The court accepted that the authority was responsible for the road being unsafe in this case.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.
 
 

Boys & Maughan Solicitors, India House, 11 Hawley Street, Margate, Kent CT9 1PZ Tel: 01843 234000
Boys & Maughan Solicitors, 83 Station Road, Birchington, Kent CT7 9RB Tel: 01843 842356
Boys & Maughan Solicitors, 99 High Street, Broadstairs, Kent CT10 1NQ Tel: 01843 868861
Boys & Maughan Solicitors, 57 Queen Street, Ramsgate, Kent CT11 9EJ Tel: 01843 595990

Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA)
© Boys & Maughan Solicitors. All rights reserved.

Legal Notice
[smaller] Change text size [larger]