skip navigation

Mediate Properly - or Pay


 
There have been a number of cases in which a refusal to mediate on the part of one party in a dispute has led to that party carrying the costs (at least in part) of the other party, even though the party which refused to mediate won the case. Recently, however, a case has suggested that there may also be adverse costs implications in the event that one of the parties unreasonably delays consenting to the commencement of mediation ‘until very late, when its chances of success are very poor’.

This is another example of the impatience shown by the courts to intransigent litigants.

In a second case, a 'winner' who greatly overstated the value of his claim and who showed an intransigent attitude in mediation found that the losing defendant did not pay his whole costs and he paid some of the defendant's costs because his participation in mediation was not a genuine attempt to achieve a fair settlement.

 
The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.
 
 

Boys & Maughan Solicitors, India House, 11 Hawley Street, Margate, CT9 1PZ Tel: 01843 234000
Boys & Maughan Solicitors, 83 Station Road, Birchington, CT7 9RB Tel: 01843 842356
Boys & Maughan Solicitors, 99 High Street, Broadstairs, CT10 1NQ Tel: 01843 868861
Boys & Maughan Solicitors, 57 Queen Street, Ramsgate, CT11 9EJ Tel: 01843 595990

Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA)
© Boys & Maughan Solicitors. All rights reserved.

Legal Notice
[smaller] Change text size [larger]